Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-9748115-20150519080504/@comment-11223544-20150527050732

Nicholas Trapani wrote: I agree with your opinion on Logopedia. But, CLG may still have potential if the people on this wiki (not the administrators, the actual users) get it together and properly rebuild it. I saw some people saying the transition will take some time, which is the main problem right now. People have to realize that this site is still relatively new and learn not to expect everything to be finished within a week. If we were to join up as a group and correct all of the problems and expand upon this wiki, CLG could be amazing. It doesn't need to take long either; if people read the templates properly and/or copy directly off of them, the process of making a page can be rapidly sped up.

EDIT: My suggestion for people who don't like the new wiki and don't feel like contributing is to stay on the old one until either this one is in a "completed" form or the old one is shut down.

Expanding off of that, exactly how long did it take for the old CLG Wiki to reach its current form?

How long has KRS Logos been up? Since 2001 maybe? Yeah... It's going to take at least a couple of years, given that we're only copying and pasting.

I don't even like the idea of moving.